Palmer Amaranth Biology and Management
Mohsen Mohseni-Moghadam, Cheryl Kent, and Jamshid Ashigh
College of Agricultural, Consumer and Environmental Sciences, New Mexico State University
Authors: Respectively, graduate student, Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences; Extension Agricultural Agent, Bernalillo County Extension Office; and Extension Weed Scientist/Assistant Professor, Department of Extension Plant Sciences, New Mexico State University. (Print Friendly PDF)
Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri), a native North American weed also known as careless weed, is recognized as one of the most troublesome weed species in the southern and southwestern United States (Webster, 2001). Palmer amaranth is a short-lived, summer annual plant that readily invades croplands (Steyermark, 1963). Compared to other Amaranthus species, such as redroot pigweed and prostrate pigweed, Palmer amaranth has the most aggressive growth habit and is therefore extremely competitive with crops even at low densities (Massinga et al., 2001; Rowland et al., 1999).
The word amaranth comes from the Greek amarantos, which means the one that does not wither or the never-fading flower. Amaranthus is a large genus that includes three recognized sub-genera and nearly 75 species. This genus is part of the Amaranthaceae family, and only 10 species in this group are dioecious (separate male and female plants). In contrast to the monoecious Amaranthus spp., the dioecious Amaranthus spp. are all native to North America, ranging from southern California to Texas and northern Mexico. Palmer amaranth is a very successful invasive species as evidenced by its expansion both in eastern North America and overseas (Mosyakin and Robertson, 2003).
Palmer amaranth is an erect summer annual plant that germinates from seeds during late winter through fall. Palmer amaranth may reach 1 to 7 feet (0.3 to 2 m) in height.
- Roots: Roots are mostly taproot and reddish in color.
- Seedling: Cotyledons are 0.3 to 0.4 inch long (0.7 to 1 cm), narrow, and green to reddish in color on the upper surface, with a reddish tint on the lower surfaces (Figure 1).
Figure 1. Palmer amaranth seedling.
- Stem: Stem is generally coarse with colors varying from green to red to a mix of both colors (Figure 2).
Figure 2. Palmer amaranth plant shape.
- Leaves: Leaves are alternate, ovate, 2 to 8 inches long (5 to 20 cm), and 0.5 to 2.5 inches wide (1.3 to 6 cm) (Figure 2).
- Flowers: Flowers are small and green and are produced in dense, compact, terminal panicles that range from 4 to 20 inches in length (10 to 50 cm), with smaller axillary spikes at the base. Male and female flowers are on separate plants. Inner female sepals are spoon-shaped and only 0.08 to 0.16 inch long (2 to 4 mm). Male flower inner sepals are 0.09 to 0.2 inch in length (2.3 to 5 mm) and tapered to a point (Figure 3).
Figure 3. Palmer amaranth’s female (A) and male (B) flowers.
- Fruit: Fruit are single-seeded utricles that reach 0.06 to 0.08 inch in length (1.5 to 2 mm) and become wrinkled when dry. The utricles open like a lid to expose the seed.
- Seeds: Seeds are dark reddish-brown to black, lens-shaped, and 0.04 to 0.05 inch long (1 to 1.3 mm) (Figure 4) (DiTomaso and Healy, 2007).
Figure 4. Palmer amaranth seeds.
Uses and Toxicity
People around the world have valued Amaranthus spp. as a leafy vegetable, cereal, and ornamental. Different Native American tribes used Amaranthus spp. extensively as a source of food. The Cocopa, Mohave, and Pima tribes would bake and eat Palmer amaranth leaves. Seeds of Palmer amaranth were also ground into meal and used for food by the Navajo and Yuma tribes (Sauer, 1957). Nevertheless, Palmer amaranth also possesses some toxic properties. Under favorable growth conditions and prior to flowering, Palmer amaranth plants store high concentrations of nitrates that, upon conversion to nitrite during digestion, can be poisonous to livestock (Schmutz et al., 1974). Also, the presence of oxalate in Palmer amaranth can be harmful to livestock (Saunders and Becker, 1984). Because of these toxic properties, it is not advisable to graze livestock in areas predominantly infested with Palmer amaranth.
Palmer amaranth is capable of producing up to 600,000 seeds per female plant (Kneely, 1987). Research has shown that its seeds usually degrade after three years in the soil (Langcuster, 2008). The prolific seed production along with small seed size of this weed facilitate rapid seed dispersal and restocking of soil seed banks (Morgan et al., 2001). Palmer amaranth seeds are generally distributed through irrigation waters (Wilson, 1980), wind (Menges, 1987), and human activities such as movement of field and harvest equipment (Sauer, 1957; Norsworthy et al., 2008).
Palmer amaranth has many characteristics that make it a competitive weed. Its seeds can germinate under a wide range of temperatures, from as low as 61/50° F (day/night; 16/10° C) with a low germination rate (Keeley et al., 1987) to peak germination at 95/86° F (35/30° C) (Guo and Al-Khatib, 2003). As a result, seeds can germinate from late winter through fall depending on the region in the state.
Other characteristics that make Palmer amaranth a competitive weed include C4 photosynthetic mechanism, aggressive growth at higher temperatures, and high water-use efficiency (Guo and Al-Khatib, 2003; Horak and Loughlin, 2000; Keeley et al., 1987). These characteristics contribute to Palmer amaranth’s aggressive growth of more than 2 inches/day under full light (Horak and Lougbin, 2000).
Many studies have documented the negative effects of Palmer amaranth on crop yield. Rowland et al. (1999) reported a 10% decrease in cotton lint yield for every additional Palmer amaranth plant per 32 feet of row. There are also reports of some allelopathic effects associated with Palmer amaranth. Megnes (1987) also showed that the incorporation of Palmer amaranth residues into soil 7 weeks before planting reduced the growth of carrot and onion by 49% and 68%, respectively.
The most effective management method for Palmer amaranth is a combination of preventive, cultural, mechanical, and chemical methods. To obtain long-term management of Palmer amaranth, a multiple-tactic approach is necessary. Integrating crop and herbicide rotation, diversifying in-season herbicides, closely monitoring fields, completely controlling the weed in rotational crops, using cover crops, cleaning harvest and tillage equipment, and removing escapees before seed production can all be used to achieve acceptable season-long control of Palmer amaranth (Holshouser, 2008). Our observations have indicated that, depending on the environmental conditions, Palmer amaranth can set seeds between approximately 3 (under stress conditions) and 8 (under optimal conditions) weeks after germination. It is of utmost importance to monitor fields and control Palmer amaranth in its early stages of development to prevent seed production.
For immediate control of infestations, Palmer amaranth plants are vulnerable to cultivation, herbicides, and flaming during the seedling stage of development. But because of rapid early development, the opportunity period for control is brief, and thus diligent monitoring and timely interventions are critical (Langcuster, 2008). Mowing alone is not as effective as cultivation because Palmer amaranth plants are usually not killed by mowing, and the regrowth may still set a limited number of seeds close to the ground. Therefore, mowing must be done in conjunction with other tactics to provide acceptable control of Palmer amaranth plants.
Both pre- and postemergence herbicides have been effective in controlling Palmer amaranth. There are many active ingredients that provide effective control and have been registered in different cropping systems. A list of effective herbicides for controlling Palmer amaranth in different crops/sites and some information regarding their usage is given in Table 1. When considering the use of an herbicide, read the label and follow the instructions and precautions carefully. Nothing can take the place of reading the label and making applications according to label directions. An herbicide’s poor performance can often be traced to improper use and failure to follow label directions.
Table 1. Herbicide Options for the Control/Suppression of Palmer Amaranth in Different Crops/Sitesa
|Application||Mode of Action
|Examples of Site
|Acifluorfen-sodium||ULTRA BLAZER||POST||Inhibition of protoporphyrinogen oxidase (14)||Peanuts, strawberries, rice|
|Carfentrazone-ethyl||AIM EC||POST||Inhibition of protoporphyrinogen oxidase (14)||Tomatoes, chile, eggplants|
|Dicamba||VISION||POST||Action like indole acetic acid (synthetic auxins) (4)||Corn, cotton, sorghum, rangeland|
|Dimethenamid||SORTIE||PRE||Inhibition of very-long-chain fatty acids (VLCFAs) (15)||Corn, garlic, potato, onion|
|Ethalfluralin||SONALAN HFP||PRE||Microtubule assembly inhibition (3)||Peanuts, sunflower, canola|
|Flumiclorac pentyl ester||RESOURCE||POST||Inhibition of protoporphyrinogen oxidase (14)||Corn, cotton|
|Flumioxazin||CHATEAU WDG||PRE and POST||Inhibition of protoporphyrinogen oxidase (14)||Sugarcane, pecan, alfalfa, peanuts|
|Glufosinate-ammonium||IGNITE||POST||Inhibition of glutamine synthetase (10)||Cotton|
|Glyphosate||ROUNDUP||POST||Inhibition of EPSP synthase (9)||Pecan, cotton, alfalfa, pasture grasses, rangeland|
|Imazamox||RAPTOR||POST||Inhibition of acetolactate synthase (ALS) (2)||Chicory, alfalfa|
|Imazapic||CADRE||POST||Inhibition of ALS (2)||Peanuts|
|Indaziflam||ALION||PRE||Inhibition of cellulose biosynthesis (29)||Pecan|
|Isoxaflutole||BALANCE FLEXX||PRE and POST||Inhibition of 4-hydroxyphenyl-pyruvate-dioxygenase (27)||Corn|
|Lactofen||COBRA||PRE and POST||Inhibition of protoporphyrinogen oxidase (14)||Cotton, peanuts|
|Mesotrione||CALLISTO||PRE and POST||Inhibition of 4-hydroxyphenyl-pyruvate-dioxygenase (27)||Corn|
|Metribuzin||DIMETRIC DF 75%||PRE and POST||Photosystem II inhibitors (5)||Corn|
|Paraquat dichloride||PARAZONE 3SL||POST||Photosystem I inhibitors (22)||Alfalfa, corn, cotton, grapes, sorghum|
|Pendimethalin||PROWL H2O||PRE||Microtubule assembly inhibition (3)||Corn, peanuts, pecan, alfalfa, cotton|
|Prosulfuron||PEAK||POST||ALS inhibitor (2)||Barley, oats, wheat, corn|
|Pyraflufen-ethyl||ET HERBICIDE||POST||Inhibition of protoporphyrinogen oxidase (14)||Cucurbits, fruiting vegetables|
|Pyrithiobac-sodium||STAPLE||POST||ALS inhibitor (2)||Cotton|
|Rimsulfuron||RESOLVE DFe||PRE and POST||Inhibition of acetolactate synthase (ALS) (2)||Corn, cotton, sorghum|
|S-metolachlor||DUAL MAGNUM||PRE||Inhibition of very-long-chain fatty acids (VLCFAs) (15)||Corn, cotton|
|Saflufenacil||SHARPEN||PRE and POST||Inhibition of protoporphyrinogen oxidase (14)||Corn, cotton, sorghum|
|Sulfentrazone||SPARTAN 4F||PRE||Inhibition of protoporphyrinogen oxidase (14)||Sugarcane|
|Tembotrione||LAUDIS||POST||Inhibition of 4-hydroxyphenyl-pyruvate-dioxygenase (27)||Corn|
|Topramezone||ARMEZON||POST||Inhibition of 4-hydroxyphenyl-pyruvate-dioxygenase (27)||Corn|
|Trifluralin||TREFLAN 4 EC||PRE||Microtubule assembly inhibition (3)||Pecan, alfalfa, corn, sunflower|
|aThe list is current as of August 2012; however, labels change frequently, and the herbicide’s current label should be reviewed for the most recent conditions or restrictions before use. Read all labels carefully and comply with their site-use directions (e.g., pre-harvest interval, restricted-entry interval, registration). For the very latest label information on a given herbicide, contact the manufacturer, Extension services in your area, or the company or distributor that sells the product.
bOther trade names of mentioned active ingredients alone or in combination may be available in the market.
cHerbicide groupings follow the Weed Science Society of America’s (WSSA) nationally accepted grouping. The grouping is based on the modes of action of herbicides. For effective herbicide resistance management it is imperative to rotate or mix the herbicides from different groups.
dFor the complete list of crops/sites registrations, please see the label of each herbicide.
eSuppresses the growth of Palmer amaranth.
Herbicide Resistance in Palmer Amaranth
As a result of high genetic diversity among Palmer amaranth plants and high selection pressure from certain herbicides (caused by repeated use of those herbicides), several populations of Palmer amaranth in the U.S. have evolved resistance to herbicides with different mechanisms of action (Heap, 2012). Resistance to dinitroanilines (i.e., trifluralin) in Palmer amaranth was first reported in South Carolina and Tennessee in 1989 (Gossett et al., 1992). Since then, Palmer amaranth populations have also evolved resistance to acetolactate synthase (ALS) inhibiting herbicides (i.e., imazaquin, imazethapyr, thifensulfuron), photosystem II inhibitor herbicides (i.e., atrazine), and 5-enolpyruvylshikimate-3-phosphate (EPSP) synthase inhibitor herbicides (i.e., glyphosate) in different regions of the U.S. Palmer amaranth was first reported to have evolved resistance to glyphosate in Georgia (Culpepper et al., 2006). Since then, resistance to glyphosate in Palmer amaranth has been reported in Tennessee, North Carolina, South Carolina, Alabama, Mississippi, Missouri, Louisiana, Arkansas, and New Mexico (Heap, 2012).
The evolution of herbicide resistance in Palmer amaranth populations has threatened the ongoing sustainability of herbicides as important resources for weed management. Proactive adoptions of resistance management practices are required to maintain the benefits of using chemicals in our management practices.
Critical reviews of this article by Dr. Mithila Jugulam, Dr. Brian Schutte, and Mr. Jason French, M.Sc., are acknowledged.
Culpepper, A.S., T.L. Grey, W.K. Vencill, J.M. Kichler, T.M. Webster, S.M. Brown, A.C. York, J.W. Davis, and W.W. Hanna. 2006. Glyphosate resistant Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) confirmed in Georgia. Weed Science, 54, 620–626.
DiTomaso, J.M., and E.A. Healy. 2007. Weeds of California and other western states, vol. 2 [Publication 3488]. Oakland: University of California Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources.
Gossett, B.J., E.C. Murdock, and J.E. Toler. 1992. Resistance of Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) to dinitroaniline herbicides. Weed Technology, 6, 587–591.
Guo, P., and K. Al-Khatib. 2003. Temperature effects on germination and growth of redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus), Palmer amaranth (A. palmeri), and common waterhemp (A. rudis). Weed Science, 51, 869–875.
Heap, I. 2012. International survey of herbicide resistant weeds [Online]. Retrieved April 30, 2012, from www.weedscience.org.
Holshouser, D. 2008. Virginia soybean update, vol. 11, no. 1. Suffolk: Virginia Cooperative Extension.
Horak, M.J., and T.M. Loughlin. 2000. Growth analysis of four Amaranthus species. Weed Science, 48, 347–355.
Keeley, P.E., C.H. Carter, and R.J. Thullen. 1987. Influence of planting date on growth of Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri). Weed Science, 35, 199–204.
Langcuster, J. 2008. Scarier than Halloween. The nightmare weed that threatens southern row crops [Online]. Retrieved March 2012, from http://www.aces.edu/department/extcomm/npa/daily/archives/003801.php.
Massinga, R.A., R.S. Currie, M.J. Horak, and J. Boyer Jr. 2001. Interference of Palmer amaranth in corn. Weed Science, 49, 202–208.
Menges, R.M. 1987. Allelopathic effects of Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) and other plant residues in soil. Weed Science, 35, 339–347.
Morgan, G.D., P.A. Baumann, and J.M. Chandler. 2001. Competitive impact of Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) on cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) development and yield. Weed Technology, 15, 408–412.
Mosyakin, S.L., and K.R. Robertson. 2003. Amaranthus palmeri. In Flora of North America Editorial Committee (Eds.), Flora of North America north of Mexico, vol. 4 (pp. 412–418). New York: Oxford University Press USA.
Norsworthy, J.K., G.M. Griffith, R.C. Scott, K.L. Smith, and L.R. Oliver. 2008. Confirmation and control of glyphosate-resistant Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) in Arkansas. Weed Technology, 22, 108–113.
Rowland, M.W., D.S. Murray, and L.M. Verhalen. 1999. Full-season Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) interference with cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Weed Science, 47, 305–309.
Sauer, J. 1957. Recent migration and evolution of the dioecious amaranths. Evolution, 11, 11–31.
Saunders, R.M., and R. Becker. 1984. Amaranthus: A potential food and feed resource. In Y. Pomeranz (Ed.), Advances in cereal science and technology, vol. 6 (pp. 357–396). Manhattan, KS: U.S. Grain Marketing Research Laboratory, USDA-ARS.
Schmutz, E.M., B.N. Freeman, and R.E. Reed. 1974. Livestock-poisoning plants of Arizona. Tucson: The University of Arizona Press.
Steyermark, J.A. 1963. Flora of Missouri. Ames: Iowa State University Press.
Webster, T.M. 2001. Weed survey-southern states, broadleaf crops subsection. Proceedings, Southern Weed Science Society, 54, 244–259.
Wilson, R.G., Jr. 1980. Dissemination of weed seeds by surface irrigation water in Western Nebraska. Weed Science, 28, 87–92.
Brand names appearing in publications are for product identification purposes only. No endorsement is intended, nor is criticism implied of similar products not mentioned. Persons using such products assume responsibility for their use in accordance with current label directions of the manufacturer.
The pesticide recommendations in this publication are provided only as a guide. The authors and New Mexico State University assume no liability resulting from their use. Please be aware that pesticide labels and registration can change at any time; by law, it is the applicator’s responsibility to use pesticides ONLY according to the directions on the current label. Use pesticides selectively and carefully and follow recommended procedures for the safe storage and disposal of surplus pesticides and containers.
To find more resources for your business, home, or family, visit the College of Agricultural, Consumer and Environmental Sciences on the World Wide Web at aces.nmsu.edu.
Contents of publications may be freely reproduced for educational purposes. All other rights reserved. For permission to use publications for other purposes, contact email@example.com or the authors listed on the publication.
New Mexico State University is an equal opportunity/affirmative action employer and educator. NMSU and the U.S. Department of Agriculture cooperating.
Published and electronically distributed March 2013, Las Cruces, NM.